platform: Ulti Arena reviews: Proof of gaming - an NFT solution that rewards players while playing non-blockchain games

platform: Ulti Arena reviews: Proof of gaming - an NFT solution that rewards players while playing non-blockchain games

< Show Wisdom Collection: Ulti Arena reviews: Proof of gaming - an NFT solution that rewards players while playing non-blockchain gamesarticle avatarAbegail Prado

Teacher

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

Proof of gaming concept is the current trend nowadaysp, luckily one of the most high income this pandemic since there is so much worker has been stopped and they go on online for extra income. Gaming is a lifesaver that gives food to almost all people especially in the cryptocurrency world. Hence, there is so many developers promote and create amazing gaming platform that benefits both the player and the developer

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

No, because ulti arena supports NFT and provide the best gaming experience to the players. Besides, ulti arena is the place to connect artist and in that way they could talk on how to not remove NFT in gaming projects just in case

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

Im pretty sure that the future of gaming industry in the future is very Huge since it is very convenient especially nowadays that the pandemic is getting worse because of so many virus strands. In this way, we can minimize our health risk and people can earn even at home as long as the internet is available

article avatarJeffrey Escabarte

Journalist

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

As eSports gets so popular these days, this proof of gaming concept can be very beneficial for gamers. Apart from enjoying the game, we can also earn just by playing. This kind of project will get the interest of gamers. I would suggest to add other popular mobile games in their platform because gaming on mobile is more convenient and more accessible than PC gaming. Mobile Legends is very suitable since it has many players all around the world.

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

I don’t think so. Because they uses different games. And most NFT gaming projects are building their own games, Ulti Arenas concept uses other existing eSport games that their users can play. They are built differently.

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

I would say that crypto gaming industry is the future. Day by day the number of gamers are increasing. This innovation in the gaming industry which helps gamers earn crypto by playing their respective games can boost their will and determination in competing.

article avatarIdika Ezinne

Teacher/entrepreneur /crypto enthusiast

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

I think the proof of gaming concept is a good one.f This will encourage gamers because they can earn crypto while gaming,also those who are already into crypto but don't play games may want to jump in due to the rewards attached be to gaming

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

No. I don't think so. I think it's because every gaming project already have their own platform or Blockchain per say. There's only going to be competitions in the area of gamers that sign on to each project I think.

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

I think the future is great for the gaming industry because almost every game played even on smartphones is now embedded on a Blockchain. So many people do not realize that just yet,but gaming industries are cashing in on that

article avatarSosad Saya

Influencer and Safety officer

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

The Proof of Concept Gameplay milestone is used to determine if a game is actually fun. In this milestone, the team may not have an actual level of the game to play in, but the primary features of the game are present.And Actually everyone's played for win rewards or win tokens in games #playtoearn Almost actives for make a big win prizes and rewards in in games and me too. So in games to played will updated always. thankyou so much.

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

Tokenomics that rewards ULTI Holders We believe that a strong community should be rewarded, as such we dedicate 30% of ALL platform fees to Buyback & Burn.

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

I think that is awesome everything can change alltimes, Crypto in game it's looks like and make anyone who looking for new collections interested it's not difficult to learning and do its. However everything is no longer , because technology updated and fast to change and I never met it all , right now. happy funny and no limited to stoped its. Thankyou So much sir.

article avatarSubhi Ash Shalih

freelancer

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

POG is a new concept in the world of gaming and blockchain that focuses on the player experience while playing the game. In contrast to other concepts, the way PoG works is broader because all the track records of players in the game will be assessed.

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

The solution that ultiarena has should be adopted by other gaming platforms. This must be done because every success of the gaming platform is supported by a strong community. So their time and energy must be appreciated. All gamers should be able to feel a new better experience.

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

igital games have given birth to new innovations. Through a combination of non-fungible tokens (NFT), decentralized finance (DeFi), and blockchain-based gameplay developers, play blockchain games with financial rewards for players participating in the latest GameFi trends. The gaming market is booming, and so is blockchain technology. It is estimated that the digital gaming industry generated an estimated $175 billion in revenue from mobile, console, and PC games by 2020, and DeFi decentralized applications (dApps) built on multiple blockchains currently hold more than $165 billion in total locked value (TVL). Evidence points to the future of blockchain gaming with huge growth potential, and developers seeking funding and community support can find both through GameStation. It will be interesting to see what GameFi has in store for blockchain gamers as more releases will be launched to the market with GameStation guidance pushing the industry forward.

article avatarMoel benks

Junior full stack

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

Play-to-Earn? Play-to-earn is a concept that is often used in gaming where the platform gives players the opportunity to acquire all forms of in-game assets and items that can be transferred to the real world into money or other means of exchange of value.

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

Games are being developed precisely: game studios developers, artists and managers to produce assets, sounds, music, Interfaces – for each game there are hundreds of assets produced. Why should one asset be used in the game only once by a player? Why don't they own those assets and transfer them to another game? Artists should also be able to track their creatives to see what in-games are being used and how they are being used by players. All of these challenges can be easily solved by

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

Token yang tidak dapat dipertukarkan adalah salah satu tren cryptocurrency terpanas pada tahun 2021 – namun, saat ini, pasar NFT telah mengalami penurunan yang serius. Finance Magnates sebelumnya melaporkan bahwa pasar NFT telah runtuh sejak awal Mei. Namun, beberapa analis mengatakan bahwa kecelakaan itu sebenarnya adalah hal yang positif untuk ruang angkasa – sekarang setelah hype berakhir, inovasi yang sebenarnya dapat terus berlanjut. Sementara NFT paling umum dikenal karena penggunaannya di dunia seni, mereka juga semakin banyak digunakan dan dikembangkan dalam game. Baru-baru ini, Finance Magnates Berbicara dengan Beryl Li, salah satu pendiri Yield Guild Games, sebuah perusahaan yang berbasis di Filipina yang sedang menjajaki potensi pasar NFT di ekonomi virtual. Yield Guild Games menggambarkan dirinya sebagai “serikat pemain dan investor game terdesentralisasi yang menghasilkan hasil dari game berbasis NFT.”

article avatarMathew Emiola

Market analyst,defi tutor, forex and cryptotrader, crypto analyst

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

The Proof of Concept Gameplay milestone is used to determine if a game is actually fun. In this milestone, the team may not have an actual level of the game to play in, but the primary features of the game are present.

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

I dont that could endanger NFT project.... The crypto space is wide enough to take In different projects with different solution.. i believe it wil only help other nft gaming projects improve

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

I believe this is the next big thing with tech genius like Mark Zuckerberg aiming to invest into the industry from new i read https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theverge.com/platform/amp/22588022/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-ceo-metaverse-interview

article avatarJon Courtney

Educator, minister, council.

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

I have a rather robust set of skills, combined with the experience and ultimately wisdom, that comes with online gaming, hardware, and various blockchain technology. Proof of gaming concepts certainly have been around for a few years. Many of these games seem to be thriving at the moment. But I would highly encourage caution with this technology, for many reasons. Not just for security, but psychologically. My research into this topic more thoroughly has revealed a lot of potential for abuse that most people just seemed to have glossed over, or outright ignored. First, I would like to talk about the psychological aspects. Anything that brings you joy, a sense of accomplishment, and other subconscious reward triggering mechanisms can become an addiction. Feeding into the addiction of a player, to keep the network running, right out of the gate seems rather horrifying to me, personally. A great comparison at the moment is what we have witnessed with Facebook, having the whistleblower coming forward and testifying about their experimentation on users, and using the business model of drumming up as much anger or outrage as possible just to keep users engaged on their platform for longer periods of time than they typically would. Phrases such as “Putting the companies’ profits above the user’s health.” Come to mind. Of course, this could be resolved with some technical integration from psychologists. (But really have you talked to or heard from a psychologist about crypto in recent times?) I personally doubt CEOs are going to even listen, when their very business model is put into jeopardy. They can be fired for NOT maximizing their profits to shareholders. It technically goes against their very job status. That’s not to say every single game maker sets out to create an evil empire, or even that it should be discounted completely, for there are some games that this would indeed be beneficial too. However, I have seen little information regarding how these “proof of gaming” games, would take into account issues such as latency in a first-person shooter platform (CS: is listed as an upcoming early adopter of this technology), and there are many others for that matter. This makes for a precarious situation that people could simply “game” the game to make wins. Most people are familiar with “aim bots”. It wouldn’t take much effort to sway the servers to your favor. This ties into my first topic, addiction. If your network depends on the users staying in game to keep mining the very system running, well you just created an addict. In addition to this, there are literal prison “miners” in some countries that are given the task to mine for gold in games such as WOW. This gives incentives to bad actors. As you can see it clearly could turn good actors into bad ones, making choices for the clients that really aren’t in their best interests. However, so long as these issues are addressed, it is possible there is some light at the end of the tunnel. There are some games being ran at the moment that reward users with NFT assets just for completing collections. Dapper labs have many already up and running, ranging from the NBA to the NFL, and other companies have taken to make fantasy football NFT friendly, rewarding users with player cards and more. These can fall into the “arts” category even though they are technically games. They will mature and gain value as these NFTs are burned, lost, and so forth. What do you think about the proof of gaming concept? I have a rather robust set of skills, combined with wisdom, and experience both with online gaming, hardware, and various blockchain technology. Proof of gaming concepts certainly have been around for a few years. Many of these games seem to be thriving at the moment. But I would highly encourage caution with this technology, for many reasons. Not just for security, but psychologically. My research into this topic more thoroughly has revealed a lot of potential for abuse that most people just seemed to have glossed over, or outright ignored. First, I would like to talk about the psychological aspects. Anything that brings you joy, a sense of accomplishment, and other subconscious reward triggering mechanisms can become an addiction. Feeding into the addiction of a player, to keep the network running, right out of the gate seems rather horrifying to me, personally. A great comparison at the moment is what we have witnessed with Facebook, having the whistleblower coming forward and testifying about their experimentation on users, and using the business model of drumming up as much anger or outrage as possible just to keep users engaged on their platform for longer periods of time than they typically would. Phrases such as “Putting the companies’ profits above the user’s health.” Come to mind. Of course, this could be resolved with some technical integration from psychologists. (But really have you talked to or heard from a psychologist about crypto in recent times?) I personally doubt CEOs are going to even listen, when their very business model is put into jeopardy. They can be fired for NOT maximizing profits to shareholders. It technically goes against their very job title. That’s not to say every single game maker sets out to create an evil empire, or even that it should be discounted completely, for there are some games that this would indeed be beneficial too. Still, I have seen little information regarding how these “proof of gaming” games, would take into account issues such as latency in a first-person shooter platform (CS: is listed as an upcoming early adopter of this technology), and there are many others for that matter. This makes for a precarious situation that people could simply “game” the game to make wins. Most people are familiar with “aim bots”. It wouldn’t take much effort to sway the servers to your favor. This ties into my first topic, addiction. If your network depends on the users staying in game to keep “mining”, well not only have you just created an addict. But you are exploiting the physical computer systems running said games. You are outsourcing resources that your servers would normally handle directly to the consumer. A great example is the monetary costs of electricity, the very hardware needed to keep the network running. Offsetting your costs of operation right to the game players themselves, and incentivizing them to “stay longer” so they can “earn rewards” generally makes it so the user is paying, and then paying again for the potential reward of an NFT, gas fees, etc. In addition to this, I want to point out that right now there are still physical prisons in some countries that coerce inmates into playing games, where they are given the task of being “gold miners”. I recall reading news stories of these prisons using games such as World of Warcraft as an example of how in return for not having to do hard labor, they are sat down for hours to days on end to mine and resell the game gold for real physical currency. This again gives incentives to bad actors. As you can see it clearly could turn good actors into bad ones without them even realizing what they have done until it’s too late. Making choices for the clients that really aren’t in their best interests never ends well for either party. So long as these issues are addressed, I believe there is some light at the end of the tunnel. There are some games being ran at the moment that reward users with NFT assets just for completing collections. Dapper labs have many games already up and running, ranging from the NBA to the NFL, and other companies have taken to make fantasy football NFT friendly, rewarding users with player cards and more. Though these technically can fall into the “arts” category they are still technically games. They will mature and gain value as these NFTs are burned, lost, and so forth. It will be interesting to see where this ends up. Regulations are still being debated, not even created yet, so it’s anyone’s guess. If I were a betting person, I would say they will find a niche. Again, we have to take into account the human factor, exploitation, and ease of which it can be done. People could be swindled, or get so enveloped by the games that they end up building a fake life that will have long lasting negative health consequences for them should they fall prey to bad actors. As with any new technology there is going to be pitfalls. We will all live and learn as it progresses.

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

I do think that Ulti Arena’s solution could pose problems for some NFT gaming projects. Everyone at the moment is scrambling to “be the first.”, and not necessarily “the best”. Healthy competition is great for any community that wants improvements. They most certainly have disrupted the gaming environment online. “Game changing” is the perfect description. (Pardon the pun.) I want to again emphasize that latency, hardware variations, and other factors will give some players better results. This could lead up to exploitation through latency, or even bugs in the code of the programming itself. In the old days of UT99, I recall watching how players could simply disconnect the ethernet cord for a moment, come up and capture a point, plug back in and the system would favor their movements as the legitimate path, over all other players. It’s ripe for exploitation if there isn’t serious thought put into tackling these monumental challenges. What happens if you’re playing a game of CS and the internet drops, while you’re competing for an NFT that’s highly valued? Players are going to feel even more pressure knowing that their actions are being tokenized down to a science. They could find that “If I do XYZ I can game the system to my advantage.” There are just so many unknown knowns at the moment to be certain. Many games will be perfectly fine, for they aren’t designed the same way. They might not use such a comprehensive and robust setup. Ultimately, I must say it will come down to preference of the developers, gamers, and the technology. Not every shoe fits the same foot.

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

While I may not have a crystal ball to look into the future, I can say that as we have seen throughout history there are going to be ups and downs. Time progresses and we find better ways to do things. Some systems become so massive they integrate right into our daily lives, or seem to be indispensable. Whether we like it or not these systems most certainly will be here in one form or another. As I had stated previously, they are still trying to debate crypto. Until the regulators come to an agreement its’ still the wild west. I suspect though, that just as AI has grown exponentially more progressive so will crypto gaming. We’re still taking our first steps as babies, so far as this technology goes. In even 4 years from now it is highly probable that we’ll look back and find that we were using dial up modems when we had broadband in our backpacks. I never underestimate the power of innovation and invention. When a solution needs attention there will always be someone ready to step up and take a swing at the challenges. My biggest concern, is again how will this all impact the users psychologically? Big tech already has more data than they know what to do with, how long before these same problems start to bleed over into other projects? One person leaks the source code and public keys like what just happened with Twitch, and we have a bigger problem. People truly are going to need to take security of their minds more seriously.

article avatardmitri poleanschi

Dj | Content maker | Sound producer | Entrepreneur | Crypto Investor | Token Economist

What do you think about the proof of gaming concept?

ig tech companies are seizing the moment: Apple, Google and Amazon are all developing gaming products. In the fall of 2019, Apple released Apple Arcade, a game subscription service. Soon after, Google launched Stadia, which allows users to stream major game titles directly from the Cloud rather than fussing with downloads or a physical console. And Amazon — which in 2014 acquired Twitch, the most-popular platform to watch gamers play — is rumored to soon launch its own game-streaming service. These newcomers to the space will contend with gaming mainstays like Sony (Playstation), Nintendo (Switch) and Microsoft (Xbox) for market share.

Do you think Ulti Arena’s solution could endanger existing NFT gaming projects? Why?

If you were looking for an industry that acts as a giant income system for talented people like composers and artists, NFT marketplace development is for you. Non-fungible tokens’ importance in art and games innovates numerous services with the integration of augmented reality and virtual reality. It stimulates the appearance of new unique tech solutions. The best proof of the industry expansion is the NFT cap, which achieved the mark of $338,035,012 in 2020.

What is your take on the crypto gaming industry future?

With the advent of smartphones and easily accessible internet facilities, there has been a dramatic increase in the adoption of web-based games. Crypto being the hottest trend, crypto games are disrupting the conventional mobile and PC games. The unique proposition between the mass adoption of crypto games is that the users can earn real crypto assets as rewards while they play in exchange for their effort and time. Worldwide Asset Exchange published a stat that over 75% of online gamers love exchanging their virtual assets for currencies that can be used across various platforms. Crypto gaming does the same, allowing gamers to collect, store and exchange virtual gaming assets that are tradeable on the blockchain through various NFT marketplaces. Crypto games allow gamers to earn while they enjoy unlimited gaming built by the leading game developers.

This is not a financial advice. Please do your own research and consider the risks of trading cryptocurrencies.

Experience Experty at its fullest

Join to unleash the power of crypto wisdom and never feel FOMO again.

Waitlist